As Malaysia transitions to Phase 1 of the stamp duty self-assessment system (“STSDS”) in January 2026 for rental, general and security instruments, businesses and individuals are now placed with greater responsibility to self-assess, calculate and pay the stamp duty. This article will provide various practical insights and misconceptions commonly faced by duty payers when filing stamping submissions.
1. Stamp duty is chargeable on instruments, not transactions
Stamp duty is chargeable only when there is a written instrument. Any verbal agreements or oral understandings, even if commercially binding transaction, will not attract stamp duty. The term “instrument” is broadly defined to include any writing, whether by handwriting, typewriting, printing, electronic record or transmission in an electronically readable form. This expressly encompasses electronically signed documents and digital contracts.
Therefore, a mere existence of a transaction will not trigger stamp duty; it is the execution or creation of a written (including electronically signed) instrument that does.
2. “I do not intend to litigate, so I need not stamp”
This is a common but dangerous misconception. While failure to stamp does not invalidate the instrument, unstamped instruments could carry significant financial risks, especially under the STSDS:
- Increased late stamping penalties: Late stamping penalties are increased to RM50 or 10% of the deficient duty (whichever higher) if stamped within 3 months after the stipulated 30-day stamping period, or RM100 or 20% of the deficient duty (whichever higher) if stamped thereafter (Section 47A SA 1949). Refer to https://dnh.com.my/missed-your-stamping-deadline-heres-how-to-get-a-late-stamping-penalty-waiver-under-pkps-2026/ for more information on late stamping penalty waiver.
- Potential criminal liability: Failure to stamp a chargeable instrument without reasonable excuse may be fined up to RM20,000 upon conviction (Section 72C(1) SA 1949).
- Additional administrative penalties: If no prosecution, the Inland Revenue Board (“IRB”) may also impose a further penalty ranging from RM200 to RM2,000 against the duty payer (Section 72C(3) SA 1949).
- Inadmissibility: Unstamped instruments will not be admitted as evidence in court (subject to certain exceptions) and may be rejected by governmental authorities (Section 52 SA 1949).
In general rule, the obligation to stamp arises upon execution of the instrument (or upon receipt in Malaysia). It is irrespective of whether such instrument will be later produced in court.
3. Expired or fully performed contracts need not be stamped?
The obligation to stamp within the stipulated 30-day period crystallises the moment when the instrument is executed or first received in Malaysia. Therefore, notwithstanding the expiry, termination or complete performance of the agreement, such stamping obligation will continue to subsist.
However, a limited exception may arise where the instrument is formally rescinded or cancelled prior to stamping, in which case it may be arguable that no stamp duty is payable, as the instrument no longer evidences any subsisting obligation between the parties.
4. Substance over form principle – IRB’s approach to assessment
The IRB adopts a substance over form approach when adjudicating stamp duty. Even where parties present a single composite document, IRB may dissect it and impose separate duties on each distinct subject matter and element contained within it. As such, the title or label of the instrument by itself is not conclusive.
For instance, an instrument containing elements of both conveyance and power of attorney may be treated as separate instruments for stamp duty adjudication purposes. Furthermore, an instrument involving more than one consideration (i.e. contract value) may also be separately and distinctly charged with stamp duty on each consideration, as if they were separate instruments (Section 6 SA 1949).
5. Scope of “security” instruments under STSDS Phase 1
In the context of SA 1949, the term “security” generally refers to collateral for payment or repayment of money. This may potentially cause confusion as to the scope of “security” instruments covered under Phase 1 of the STSDS, particularly whether Phase 1 only covers such collateral-type instruments or otherwise.
Based on the IRB’s operational guidelines¹, the scope of “security” instruments under Phase 1 of the self-assessment regime would broadly include:
- Any document or agreement evidencing a promise, obligation or agreement for payment or repayment of money (e.g., loan agreements, service agreements, licence agreements, equipment lease agreements); and
- Any document or agreement for assignment of rights, transfer of ownership or novation of property other than real estate, shares and businesses (e.g., membership transfer agreements, trademark/ intellectual property assignment agreements).
As such, this widened scope of instruments will now require self-assessment and stamping by individuals and businesses.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the move to a whole new self-assessment regime represents a fundamental shift in Malaysia’s stamp duty landscape. While it promotes efficiency, it also increases compliance burdens and potential risk exposure for businesses and individuals.
We strongly recommend that businesses regularly review their contracts and establish internal stamping protocols including a customised stamp duty policy, to serve as a practical guide for employees and relevant stakeholders to strengthen the businesses’ internal stamping compliance.
***
This article was written by Chin Wan Xin (Associate) from Donovan & Ho’s corporate practice.
Our corporate practice group advises on corporate acquisitions, restructuring exercises, joint venture arrangements, shareholder agreements, employee share options and franchise businesses, Malaysia start-up founders and can assist with venture capital funds in Seed, Series A & B funding rounds. Feel free to contact us if you have any queries.
